NASA ARSET Overview and Analysis of NASA Terrestrial Water Storage Data from GRACE_GRACE-FO Pt. 1
The Story
Welcome to Part 1 of our specialized series on global hydrology and gravity anomalies: "NASA ARSET: Overview and Analysis of NASA Terrestrial Water Storage Data from GRACE/GRACE-FO Pt. 1."In this episode of the NASA Live Video Podcast, we embark on a fascinating journey to explore how space technology tracks water that is completely hidden from human sight. We focus our attention on the revolutionary GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) and its successor, GRACE-FO (Follow-On) missions—twin satellite systems that measure variations in Earth’s gravity field to monitor mass distribution changes, primarily driven by water movement.
Through the framework of NASA’s Applied Remote Sensing Training (ARSET) program, we break down the foundational concepts behind Terrestrial Water Storage (TWS). We discuss how GRACE/GRACE-FO data allows scientists to look beyond the surface, aggregating groundwater, soil moisture, surface water, snow, and ice into a comprehensive monthly global dataset. This opening part provides an essential overview of how to access and interpret these gravity-based observations to detect massive hydrologic changes across the globe.
Whether you are a hydrologist, a climate scientist, a water resource manager, or a space enthusiast eager to understand how NASA weighs the Earth's water from orbit, this episode delivers critical foundational insights. Subscribe to the NASA Live Video Podcast to catch this entire series and stay connected with the frontier of space exploration, remote sensing, and cutting-edge earth science!
Speaker 1: Hello everyone, Welcome to this applied remote sensing training on
Speaker 1: monitoring groundwater changes from Water Resources Management. My name is
Speaker 1: Amita Meta from our SET, and today we will be
Speaker 1: talking about overview and analysis of NASA terrestrial water storage
Speaker 1: data from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment or GRACE and
Speaker 1: GRACE follow on missions. We have a guest speicker today,
Speaker 1: doctor Matthew Roddell from NASAGA Space Flag Center, and I
Speaker 1: will be introducing him shortly. We'll start with a brief
Speaker 1: introduction to our SET program. Our SET is part of
Speaker 1: NASA's Earth Action Capacity Building program and it provides accessible
Speaker 1: and relevant, cost free trainings on remote sensing satellites, sensors, methods,
Speaker 1: and tools. Trainings include a variety of applications of satellite
Speaker 1: data on these thematic areas including agriculture, disasters, ecological conservation,
Speaker 1: health and air quality, water resources, and wildline fires. Trainings
Speaker 1: are tailored to audiences with a variety of experienced levels.
Speaker 1: Our SET trainings are online and there are in person
Speaker 1: trainings offered as well. There live and instructor led like
Speaker 1: this one, or there are asynchronus and self based trainings
Speaker 1: available from our SET website. As I mentioned, they're cost free.
Speaker 1: Most of our training material is translated into Spanish and
Speaker 1: many trainings are bilingual and there are multilingual options available.
Speaker 1: Our set only uses open source software and data and
Speaker 1: accommodates differing levels of expertise. Again, please visit our set
Speaker 1: website for more information. We will start with this webinar
Speaker 1: series on monitoring groundwater changes for water resources management. Now.
Speaker 1: Groundwater is water from precipitation that percolates into the soil
Speaker 1: and moves downward. It fills up cracks and openings in
Speaker 1: the rocks and sand below the surface. Depending on the
Speaker 1: porousity of the soil, it percolates down and it can
Speaker 1: extend from just below the surface all the way down
Speaker 1: to several thousand feet. You can see from this diagram
Speaker 1: that from total global water, most of it is saline
Speaker 1: and it's in ocean or it's brickish. Just two point
Speaker 1: five percent of total water is fresh water, and out
Speaker 1: of that thirty percent is in groundwater. Groundwater ages can
Speaker 1: range from months to millions of years, depending on the
Speaker 1: source of the water and how deep it is. The
Speaker 1: total groundwater volume in the upper two kilometer of continental
Speaker 1: crust is approximately twenty two point six million cubic kilometer
Speaker 1: and out of which small amount abouzero point one to
Speaker 1: five million cubic kilometers is less than fifty years old.
Speaker 1: It is the most extracted resource worldwide and its renewable
Speaker 1: resource depending on regional and environmental conditions. Traditionally, water wells
Speaker 1: are used to monitor groundwater levels. Here you can see
Speaker 1: from National Groundwater Monitoring Network blue dots show wells in
Speaker 1: the United States. So water level in these wells are
Speaker 1: regularly monitored to estimate what the groundwater levels would be
Speaker 1: at that location, and there are no direct measurements of
Speaker 1: groundwater from remote sensing observations. Measurements from GRACE and Grace
Speaker 1: follow On. They are used to estimate or infer total
Speaker 1: terrestrial water depth, and these total water depths are then used,
Speaker 1: along with additional hydrological information to derive global large scale
Speaker 1: ground water distribution at their solution of about one hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty thousand kilometer square. Additionally, there are two more
Speaker 1: sources of groundwater data. One is Global Land Data Assimilation
Speaker 1: System or GILDAS that assimilates GRACE and Grace follow On
Speaker 1: data and data as global groundwater data, and the second
Speaker 1: one is an opera surface displacement product which is derived
Speaker 1: from synthetic aperture radar measurements from Sentinel one satellite and
Speaker 1: so these two are also groundwater products available from NASA.
Speaker 1: So the overall training learning objectives are that by the
Speaker 1: end of this training you will be able to identify
Speaker 1: characteristics of groundwater quantity data sets from GRACE missions, GILDAS
Speaker 1: and opera displacement product. Access analyze and visualize GRACE data
Speaker 1: to monitor seasonal to inter annual changes in large scale
Speaker 1: total terrestrial water storage. Access analyze and usualized GILDAS data
Speaker 1: to monitor interannual to interdictal changes in groundwater at regional scale,
Speaker 1: map surface subsidence related to groundwater extractions with OPERAS data,
Speaker 1: and recognize applications of these groundwater data sets available at
Speaker 1: multiple spatial and temporal scales for monitoring drought and flood
Speaker 1: conditions and for planning groundwater resources for a variety of
Speaker 1: uses such as for drinking water or for irrigation, etc.
Speaker 1: These are the prerequisites fundamentals of remote sensing. This is
Speaker 1: a self paced course available from our set website. It
Speaker 1: provides background about satellites, their orbits, different sensors, their special
Speaker 1: and temporal resolutions and other characteristics of remote sensing data.
Speaker 1: Then there is an introductory training are set provided in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty on groundwater monitoring using obervations from Grace Missions
Speaker 1: that also has some useful information. This training will have
Speaker 1: three parts. Today, as I mentioned, will be focusing on
Speaker 1: overview and analysis of terrestrial water storage data from GRACE
Speaker 1: and Grace Fallen. Next week on April twenty eighth, Part
Speaker 1: two will be on overview and applications of gildask groundwater
Speaker 1: data products at regional scale, and on thirtieth of April,
Speaker 1: Part three will be on overview and applications of opera
Speaker 1: disc to monitor groundwater changes. There will be one homework
Speaker 1: posted on last day of the training that is thirty
Speaker 1: eeth of April, and the homework will be due on
Speaker 1: fifteenth of May. The homework will be posted on the
Speaker 1: training web page and a certificate of completion will be
Speaker 1: awarded to those who attend all live sessions and complete
Speaker 1: the homework assignments before the given t day. Start with
Speaker 1: today's session and specific objectives for today are that by
Speaker 1: the end of part one you will be able to
Speaker 1: identify characteristics of terrestrial water storage data sets from Grace
Speaker 1: and Grace Swallow on monitor seasonal and interannual changes in
Speaker 1: terrestrial water storage using GRACE analysis tool. So the outline
Speaker 1: for today is that our speaker, Doctor Matthew Rodell, will
Speaker 1: provide an overview of GRACE missions, Race data products and applications.
Speaker 1: Then we will have a demonstration of race data analysis
Speaker 1: tool that allows analysis and visualization of terrestrial water storage data.
Speaker 1: There will also be a hands on exercise that you
Speaker 1: will be conducting using the same analysis tool and some
Speaker 1: of your homework questions will be based on that. At
Speaker 1: the end, we will have a question and answer session
Speaker 1: and just a note about asking questions. Please put your
Speaker 1: questions in the questions box and we will let us
Speaker 1: them at the end of the webinar. Feel free to
Speaker 1: enter your questions as we go and we will try
Speaker 1: to get to all the questions during the question and
Speaker 1: answer session. After the webinar, the remainder of the questions
Speaker 1: will be answered in the Q and a document which
Speaker 1: will be posted on the training website about a week
Speaker 1: after the training. With that, I want to introduce our
Speaker 1: speaker for today, doctor Matthew Rodel. Doctor Matthew Rodel is
Speaker 1: the Deputy Director of Earth Sciences for Hytrosphere, Biosphere and Geophysics,
Speaker 1: or hPG at NASA Corder Spaceplight Center. HBG comprises more
Speaker 1: than three hundred and fifty scientists and engineers within five
Speaker 1: laboratories involved in remote sensing and numerical modeling of land
Speaker 1: and ocean processes and related applications. Doctor rodel has also
Speaker 1: served as Associate Deputy Director for HBG and as Chief
Speaker 1: of the Hydrological Sciences Lab. He is a member of
Speaker 1: the science teams for NASA's Gray's follow On Mission and
Speaker 1: Future Grace Continuity or Grace Sea Mission. He leads the
Speaker 1: Global Land Data Assimilation System and projects focused on monitoring
Speaker 1: groundwater storage changes, mapping and forecasting drought wetness, and detecting
Speaker 1: climate related variations in the watorcycle. Doctor Roddell is a
Speaker 1: past associate editor for the Journal of Hydrology and a
Speaker 1: current editor for the Journal of Hydrometology. He has also
Speaker 1: chaired the Hydrology program for the American Geophysical Union or
Speaker 1: AGU Fall meeting from twenty nine to twenty eleven and
Speaker 1: led various national and international scientific working groups. He received
Speaker 1: a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers in
Speaker 1: two thousand and six, a NASAJSFC Earth Science Achievement Award
Speaker 1: in two thousand and seven, a Robert H. Goddard Award
Speaker 1: for Exceptional Achievement in Science in twenty eleven, and an
Speaker 1: Arthur S. Fleming Award for Outstanding Federal Service in the
Speaker 1: area of Basic Science in twenty fifteen. He was elected
Speaker 1: to the rank of AGU Fellow in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 1: Doctor Rodel has more than one hundred and sixty peer
Speaker 1: reviewed publications and appears on clariveet Web of Sciences twenty
Speaker 1: eighteen to twenty three lists of highly cited researchers. He
Speaker 1: holds a BS in Environmental science from the College of
Speaker 1: William and Mary and a PhD in Geological Sciences from
Speaker 1: the University of Texas and Austin. With that Midnight, doctor
Speaker 1: Rodell Matt take it.
Speaker 2: Away, Hey, thank you, Amita.
Speaker 3: I might to provide an overview of the Grace and
Speaker 3: Grace follow On missions. So, Grace and Grace follow On
Speaker 3: are two separate satellite missions. One launched in two thousand
Speaker 3: and two and ended in twenty seventeen, and Grace follow
Speaker 3: On picked up in twenty eighteen and is still active.
Speaker 3: They were both jointly developed by NASA and the Germans,
Speaker 3: and both of them are twin satellite systems meeting their
Speaker 3: two satellites operating at once. And the two satellites are
Speaker 3: critical because actually the key measurement is the distance between
Speaker 3: those satellites and how it changes in time. So one
Speaker 3: is following the other, or about two and twenty kilometers apart,
Speaker 3: about four hundred kilometers above the land surface or Earth surface,
Speaker 3: and as they orbit the Earth in a near polar orbit,
Speaker 3: they basically observe all different regions of the world pretty
Speaker 3: well over the course of about a thirty day period.
Speaker 3: So these satellites again provide global coverage. You see the
Speaker 3: dates of the two missions, and right, the key measurement
Speaker 3: is the distance between the two satellites, and that distance
Speaker 3: is measured by a micro rate K band ranging instrument
Speaker 3: and actually on grace follow on, there's also an experimental
Speaker 3: laser instrument. And so imagine at two hundred and twenty
Speaker 3: kilometer distance and you're able to measure that distance every
Speaker 3: five seconds with the precision down to the size of
Speaker 3: a red blood cell.
Speaker 2: That's how accurate these measurement measurements are.
Speaker 3: In addition, there each satellite has an accelerometer on board.
Speaker 3: When an accelerometer does is it measures non gravitational forces
Speaker 3: on the satellite, in particular things like atmospheric drag. So
Speaker 3: you don't want the atmospheric drag to leak into your
Speaker 3: estimates of the changes in the distance but then and
Speaker 3: then cause errors in your observations of the gravity field.
Speaker 3: There are also GPS receivers on board to provide the
Speaker 3: precise locations of the satellites. So what happens is, you know,
Speaker 3: as these two satellites are orbiting the Earth, imagine what
Speaker 3: we call a mass anomaly, like a mountain range. That's
Speaker 3: where there's a bit or actually a lot more mass
Speaker 3: at the surface than there is on average. So imagine
Speaker 3: these satellites floating along in space and they come closer
Speaker 3: and closer to a to a mountain range, and that
Speaker 3: mountain range has extra mass, which means there's extra gravitational potential.
Speaker 3: And what it does it pulls the first satellite forward,
Speaker 3: and that satellite is basically the separation between the two
Speaker 3: satellites increases because that first satellite is sort of speeding.
Speaker 2: Up as they pass over the mountain range.
Speaker 3: The first satellite sort of held back by that extra gravity,
Speaker 3: and the second satellite speeds up in the distance between
Speaker 3: the two of them become smaller, and then things sort
Speaker 3: of even out again once they pass the Mountain range.
Speaker 2: So that's sort of an extreme example.
Speaker 3: Actually, you know, Mountain range is actually a huge amount
Speaker 3: of mass, but these satellites in the measurements are so
Speaker 3: sensitive that they can actually detect changes caused by changes
Speaker 3: in mass over time over the same location from month
Speaker 3: to month. So for example, if there's a big snowstorm
Speaker 3: and there's a lot more mass on the ground because
Speaker 3: of all that snow, that's actually enough mass and enough
Speaker 3: gravitational change to affect how the satellites orbit in a
Speaker 3: way that we can detect and then infer the amount
Speaker 3: of snow on the ground. So again we use sort
Speaker 3: of fundamental physics, you know, or understanding of how mass
Speaker 3: and gravity are related to translate the grace follow on
Speaker 3: measurements these distance between the satellites into gravi and then
Speaker 3: from there into mass concentrations, meaning like where there's more
Speaker 3: or less mass on the surface of the Earth. So,
Speaker 3: as I mentioned before, there there are subtle shifts and
Speaker 3: it's gravity field that.
Speaker 2: Are caused by movements of mass around the Earth.
Speaker 3: If you think about what moves or how do you
Speaker 3: have large movements of mass on the Earth. The biggest
Speaker 3: one is the is the ocean, So you think about
Speaker 3: ocean tides and ocean sloshing around in the ocean basins.
Speaker 3: That's a huge amount of mass. There's also atmospheric mass.
Speaker 3: Think about surface pressure pressure changes of the surface.
Speaker 2: That's really a.
Speaker 3: Measurement of the amount of mass of atmosphere above given location.
Speaker 3: And then over land changes the mass are primarily associated
Speaker 3: with redistribution of water. So again you know something like
Speaker 3: a snowstorm or a drought, or or a flood, or
Speaker 3: even you know, just smaller changes in water storage over
Speaker 3: a large region. Those are actually huge quantities of mass
Speaker 3: that again are are big enough to cause changes in
Speaker 3: gravity that then affect the orbits of the Grace satellites.
Speaker 3: So what we do is, after accounting for the atmospheric
Speaker 3: oceanic changes using models and measurements of the Earth, you
Speaker 3: sort of strip those off from the Grace observations. There
Speaker 3: are also some solid earth mass redistributions.
Speaker 2: For example, if there's an earthquake, that.
Speaker 3: Could be a large amount of mass moving and we
Speaker 3: can estimate how much that is, and there are solid
Speaker 3: earth tides that are pretty well understood. So after you
Speaker 3: remove all those other components, what's left is the changes
Speaker 3: in mass associated with changes in interestraal water storage. So
Speaker 3: I'll get to what trustra water storage is in a moment,
Speaker 3: but spice to say, it's of the it's all the
Speaker 3: water on and in the land surface.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 3: And so the data that we get from GRACE are
Speaker 3: provided as an equivalent water thickness.
Speaker 2: So imagine if you.
Speaker 3: Took all the water on and in the land, all
Speaker 3: the groundwater, so is your surface water snow ice and
Speaker 3: just created, you know, just ponded it on the surface,
Speaker 3: and then you watched how that how the the depth
Speaker 3: of that pond changed over time, you know, sort of
Speaker 3: like the depth of water in your bathtub. And and
Speaker 3: that is provided those those an anomalies of trust water
Speaker 3: storage relative to some arbitrary data are provided in centimeters
Speaker 3: or millimeters equivalent water thickness.
Speaker 2: So the so you know, when we.
Speaker 3: Say level one, two, three for GRACE products, Level one
Speaker 3: is basically the the measurements of the distance between two satellites.
Speaker 3: Level two is is the gravity anomaly fields and level
Speaker 3: three or the trust water storage anomally data that we
Speaker 3: as hydrologists can use. The effect of spatial resolution of
Speaker 3: these observations from GRACE and GRACE follow under is very
Speaker 3: coarse relative to other measurement systems that you're probably familiar with.
Speaker 3: So for GRACE, the effect of spatial resolutions about one
Speaker 3: hundred thousand to one.
Speaker 2: Hundred and fifty thousand square kilometers.
Speaker 3: To give you an idea of how big that is,
Speaker 3: the state of Illinois about one hundred and forty five
Speaker 3: thousand square kilometers, So we're.
Speaker 2: Talking about very large regions.
Speaker 3: And actually, when GRACE first launched, a lot of hydrologists
Speaker 3: through up their hands said I can't use this, it's
Speaker 3: much too much To course, I was actually among the
Speaker 3: first first hydrologists to be involved in using GRACE data.
Speaker 2: And we figure out a lot of ways to use it.
Speaker 3: And the bottom line is we have no other global
Speaker 3: measurements of total trust or water storage in a particular
Speaker 3: ground whatter, which we'll talk about later. So if you're clever,
Speaker 3: you can find a lot of ways to use these
Speaker 3: data despite the coarseness. If you look for trust or
Speaker 3: water storage data, and we'll provide some links later. They're
Speaker 3: often provided on a one degree or a half degree
Speaker 3: resolution grid and I want you to it's an important takeometric,
Speaker 3: important take on point that's really just for convenience. In
Speaker 3: order for those data to be meaningful, you can't just
Speaker 3: take one grid point and say this is how the
Speaker 3: water storage is changing over that grid point. You have
Speaker 3: to average over a sufficiently large region and I'm talking
Speaker 3: about greater than one hundred thousand square kilometers in order
Speaker 3: for your your results. You know, the time series of
Speaker 3: trust to water stores you might get, for example, in
Speaker 3: order for that to be meaningful, and the errors or
Speaker 3: the uncertainty is on the order of one to two
Speaker 3: centimeters quite one height of water change each month for
Speaker 3: a three hundred thousand square kilometer or a larger region. Okay,
Speaker 3: so what can we do with these these trust water
Speaker 3: storage data? So again I mentioned before trust water storage
Speaker 3: is some of the groundwater, some I sure surface water,
Speaker 3: snow and ice.
Speaker 2: As you can see sort of the chart on the
Speaker 2: right there.
Speaker 3: So Grace cannot and Grace follow cannot differentiate among these
Speaker 3: different trust water storage components. They're only showing the bar
Speaker 3: on the left there this total trust water storage and
Speaker 3: and in fact, I can only tell us the the
Speaker 3: changes in trust water storage, not the absolute amount of water.
Speaker 3: So don't expect that grace is going to tell you
Speaker 3: how much water is left in the Ogalalla aqua, for example.
Speaker 3: It's only gonna tell us how that water storage is changing,
Speaker 3: usually relative to the long term mean, from the GRACE data.
Speaker 3: So one of the ways that we can we can
Speaker 3: sort of tease out what's happening with the individual components
Speaker 3: is to combine the GRACE data with a with a landserface.
Speaker 2: Model through data a similation.
Speaker 3: And because that model has other information going into it
Speaker 3: from other observations and and our understanding of the system,
Speaker 3: it's able to do vertical, horizontal and temporical temporal disaggregation
Speaker 3: to make the GRACE data more more useful. So you know,
Speaker 3: if you have trust your water storage data, you know
Speaker 3: a simple approach for disaggregating would be to simply do
Speaker 3: sort of a water balance approach.
Speaker 2: So you see the boldled equation at the.
Speaker 3: Top there, groundwater equals trust your water storage chain or
Speaker 3: ground road change equals stretcher water storage change minus soul
Speaker 3: moisture minus snowater equivalent minus surface water. And you know
Speaker 3: early on in the GRACE mission. That was one of
Speaker 3: the ways that we that we evaluate the GRACE data
Speaker 3: is is to do use you know, land based observational
Speaker 3: time series of these components and and sum them all up.
Speaker 3: And so do we actually see the trust water storage
Speaker 3: changes we expect to see based on grace answer is yes, again,
Speaker 3: you can.
Speaker 2: You can do a you can do the equation.
Speaker 3: You set the equation up so you find groundwater storage
Speaker 3: changes as a residual if you have estimates of the
Speaker 3: other components from either observations or models. A more sophisticated
Speaker 3: approach is data assimilation and and this involves again you have.
Speaker 2: A land service model.
Speaker 3: The LANDSERFCE model has various inputs going into it in
Speaker 3: addition to the GRACE data. The LANDSERCE model on its
Speaker 3: own can provide estimates of how the Trust water storage
Speaker 3: change components are changing in time. But then when you
Speaker 3: assimilate the GRACE data, you have an additional constraint on
Speaker 3: the model. You basically get better results. So we're gonna
Speaker 3: be talking about GLEDS version two point two. And in
Speaker 3: this version, we have a landsforce model called the cash
Speaker 3: Man Lanserce model that simulates groundwater storage in addition to
Speaker 3: the other components, and by using GRACE as a as
Speaker 3: a constraint on that model, we get a result that's
Speaker 3: better than either the model alone or the Grace observation alone.
Speaker 3: So we'll talk about some of the GRACE products that
Speaker 3: are out there. So here's some links.
Speaker 2: When you have a moment, you.
Speaker 3: Can get the slides and follow these links. There are
Speaker 3: several different Grace and Grace follow on trusher water storage
Speaker 3: data products available. Protter Spaceflight Center, Just Propulsion Laboratory gf
Speaker 3: SAID which is in Germany, and the University Texas all
Speaker 3: of their own products. So, for example, the GPL Grace
Speaker 3: Data Portal has a few options here. You can download
Speaker 3: the grids as global mass cons. A mascon is sort
Speaker 3: of an advanced way of deriving trust or water storage
Speaker 3: data from the GRACE observations, and all of the centers
Speaker 3: now use.
Speaker 2: Mass cons as sort of the preferred method.
Speaker 3: There's an interactive Grace data browser and you can download
Speaker 3: the monthly grids for the land or for the ocean.
Speaker 3: So there are you know, a lot of applications of
Speaker 3: Grace and Grace follow on data. One of the early
Speaker 3: ones or not so early Actually, this is publication from
Speaker 3: twenty eighteen where we looked at the changes in trust
Speaker 3: water storage over the peer twenty two to twenty sixteen. Basically,
Speaker 3: at each point on Earth, we determined the rate of
Speaker 3: change of trust your water storage by fitting a linear
Speaker 3: trend after removing the seasonal cycle. So if you had
Speaker 3: you see a blue here, that means trend was upward.
Speaker 3: It was an increase in trust or water storage on
Speaker 3: average over time. You see the bar at the bottom
Speaker 3: of the units are centimeters per year, and where it's
Speaker 3: a yellow, orange or red, that means that the trust
Speaker 3: water storage was decreasing over time. And so what we
Speaker 3: did with this this study was was try to understand
Speaker 3: why trustal water storage was changing. And in some cases
Speaker 3: it's just natural variability and those are that's indicated by green.
Speaker 3: And what I mean by that is maybe you had
Speaker 3: a drought in the beginning of the time period around
Speaker 3: two thousand and two, and maybe there was you know,
Speaker 3: just sort of a wet period towards the end, and
Speaker 3: so it looks like you have this increase in trust
Speaker 3: your water storage, but we don't. We don't expected to
Speaker 3: continue a long term. It's just sort of part of
Speaker 3: the natural fluctuations. On the other hand, there are regions
Speaker 3: where where we might be you know, there might be
Speaker 3: a human a direct human impact, like groundwater pumping. And
Speaker 3: one of the first ones that we saw and the
Speaker 3: gray data was in northern India where a huge amount
Speaker 3: of water is pumped out of the opera there to
Speaker 3: use for irrigating crops. When you pump water out of
Speaker 3: an aqua faster than it can recharge, and you pour
Speaker 3: it on the land surface derigate crops, and most of
Speaker 3: the water evaporates or transpires, then over time the operas.
Speaker 2: Can be depleted and and there's a there's a.
Speaker 3: Very fast rate of depletion in northern India that's clearly anthropogenic.
Speaker 3: And then the other thing is there might be climate
Speaker 3: change signals. And the most obvious place to look for
Speaker 3: this is is someplace like Greenland, where the ice sheets
Speaker 3: are blating or melting away into the ocean, and that's
Speaker 3: why most of Greenland is red. There there might be
Speaker 3: there's some debate over whether the blue in the middle
Speaker 3: is an accumulation of snow or just a just an
Speaker 3: artifact of the data processing that might be related to
Speaker 3: something called post glacial rebound. Another more operational application is
Speaker 3: is drought monitoring. And one thing we've done is we've
Speaker 3: developed these drought indicators that are based on the GRACE
Speaker 3: data assimilation into the LANDSERFCE models. So the data simulation
Speaker 3: allows us to do again the vertical, temporal and horizontal
Speaker 3: downscaling of the GRACE data. Remember, GRACE data are monthly,
Speaker 3: they're very coarse and and in fact they're only available
Speaker 3: a few months after a near real time after real time.
Speaker 3: So to make them really useful for an operational application
Speaker 3: like drought monitoring, the data.
Speaker 2: Similation is really essential.
Speaker 3: It allows us to run up to neural time, it
Speaker 3: allows much higher spatial and temporal resolution, and we can
Speaker 3: also do things like disaggregating vertically. So this is the
Speaker 3: top two examples are a drought indicator, which basically tells
Speaker 3: us the relative conditions or the conditions each location relative
Speaker 3: to the long term going back to nineteen forty eight,
Speaker 3: which is based on the model results. Obviously, GRACE doesn't
Speaker 3: go back to nineteen forty eight. And what we see
Speaker 3: right now is we're get into some pretty dry conditions
Speaker 3: over much of the US. If you look top right there,
Speaker 3: you can see that around the world. It's a mix
Speaker 3: of dry and wet conditions around the world, which.
Speaker 2: Is what you'd expect.
Speaker 3: And then there's an example at the bottom there showing
Speaker 3: drought conditions in Brazil, which matches we see in several
Speaker 3: news reports. Another thing we can use GRACE data for
Speaker 3: is looking at flood vulnerability or flood potential. And so
Speaker 3: we have enough data from GRACE and GRACE follow on
Speaker 3: going back to two thousand and two, we have a
Speaker 3: pretty good handle on the range of variability of trust
Speaker 3: your water storage that we would expect, and when when
Speaker 3: the trustre water storage is up near the top of
Speaker 3: that range, we would say a region is vulnerable to floods,
Speaker 3: meaning you know, additional water that comes down the Lancerfruce's
Speaker 3: rain or snowmelt is likely to overwhelm the river system
Speaker 3: and then you start to have you start to have flooding.
Speaker 3: And so it's a useful way of basically preparing for floods,
Speaker 3: you know, looking for regions like this, this.
Speaker 2: Region is very wet.
Speaker 3: Maybe it's not flooding yet, but you know, look out
Speaker 3: if there's a storm or something.
Speaker 2: And that's that's some work that J.
Speaker 3: T Rieger worked on a while ago, and we've also
Speaker 3: used our drought wet syndicator maps for this purpose. Another recent,
Speaker 3: more scientific result was looking at what is apparently an
Speaker 3: abrupt decline in trust your water storage around the world,
Speaker 3: which happened around twenty fifteen. The time series is not here,
Speaker 3: but basically, if you look at the time series of
Speaker 3: all the average trust water storage for all of the
Speaker 3: land excluding the ice sheets, where there's a long term
Speaker 3: persistent trend, excluding the ice sheets and the glaciers, i
Speaker 3: should say, and you looked at how the time series
Speaker 3: evolves from two thousand and two to present, you would
Speaker 3: see around twenty fifteen the time series suddenly has this
Speaker 3: decline of about one centimeter equivalent head of water average
Speaker 3: over the entire Earth. And what's really interesting about that
Speaker 3: is that, you know, twenty fifteen lines up with when
Speaker 3: we had a series of or in the midst of
Speaker 3: a series of the warmest years on record, so twenty
Speaker 3: fifteen through twenty twenty three, or the nine enormost years
Speaker 3: in the in the data you know, in the temperature
Speaker 3: record for the Earth's surface, and that of course continued
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty four and twenty twenty five, and this
Speaker 3: decline has also persisted, or this this lower level trust
Speaker 3: your water storage has has persisted.
Speaker 2: The map here is showing it's twenty fifteen.
Speaker 3: A significant portion of the landsurface has has hit its
Speaker 3: lowest on record trust your Water Storage anomaly, which is
Speaker 3: another indicator of what's happening. And just for fun, here's
Speaker 3: an animation of GRACE data starting from twenty two and
Speaker 3: running through twenty sixteen, and just to see how it
Speaker 3: sort of evolves.
Speaker 2: You see these.
Speaker 3: Blobs of wet and dry moving around over time, and
Speaker 3: then it's going to zoom in on the Acabango Delta
Speaker 3: in Southern Africa and for this region that's outlined here.
Speaker 3: This is how the trust your Water storage changes over time,
Speaker 3: and you can see during this particular period there's a
Speaker 3: very wet period and the delta, which is home to
Speaker 3: a lot of cool, big animals you'd see in the zoo,
Speaker 3: was wet. There was a lot of water there and
Speaker 3: the elephants are happy. And then towards the end of
Speaker 3: this period, you going towards twenty sixteen, it's sort of
Speaker 3: coming back down towards normal. So that's where I'm going
Speaker 3: to leave it off, and I'm going to hand the
Speaker 3: mic over to Amita.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much Mett for your presentation on GRACE
Speaker 1: Missions data and applications. Next, going to have a short
Speaker 1: demonstration of GRACE Data Analysis Tool or interactive browser, which
Speaker 1: allows visualization of terrestrial water storage data from the missions.
Speaker 1: Is a brief outline we'll learn to navigate the GRACE
Speaker 1: Data Analysis tool. There are several features that are useful
Speaker 1: to selecting special and temporal domains. Then view terrestrial water
Speaker 1: storage or TWS maps and time series using the tool.
Speaker 1: And will use these two regions for case studies Colorado
Speaker 1: River Basin and Ogola La Aquifer. These two are very
Speaker 1: important for water resources in the Western US. So I'm
Speaker 1: going to share my screen with you. This is the
Speaker 1: data analysis tool and you can ask questions if you
Speaker 1: have any and submit questions. For launching tool to just
Speaker 1: click on launch tool here and then a welcome window opens.
Speaker 1: At the same time, you can see graced WS data
Speaker 1: in the background. So let's just quickly go through some
Speaker 1: of the features, but we are going to demonstrate all
Speaker 1: of them. So this symbol here this is about different
Speaker 1: data layers. There are multiple data sets available. You can
Speaker 1: use plus sign to add data layers. This symbol here
Speaker 1: it toggles between different layers. The visibility you can turn
Speaker 1: it off and on. I next to any data source
Speaker 1: provides information about that particular data, and this symbol here
Speaker 1: that we will look at. It allows you to draw
Speaker 1: a box to select a region, or drop a pin
Speaker 1: to select a point, or even choose river basins as
Speaker 1: we will see this one. Once you select the region,
Speaker 1: you can look at map by zooming in, or you
Speaker 1: can make time series and then you can download data
Speaker 1: by using this button. This errow here allows you to
Speaker 1: toggle between different layers, and this animate layer over time
Speaker 1: allows you to animate TWS data over different time range.
Speaker 1: So we'll start with looking at the map first. You
Speaker 1: can zoom in by your computer mouse using your computer mouse,
Speaker 1: or you can use plus and minus signs here to
Speaker 1: zoom in and zoom out. Note that here is the
Speaker 1: time window. You can change time. Last data available here
Speaker 1: is January twenty twenty six. You can change time, month
Speaker 1: and year, and you can see TWS changing. Here's the
Speaker 1: color bar given for that units are in centimeter and
Speaker 1: the range shown here is minus thirty to thirty centimeter approximately.
Speaker 1: But you can change a range of these values by
Speaker 1: sliding here. You can also change visibility or transparency of
Speaker 1: any layer by changing transparency by moving along this line.
Speaker 1: And there are some more features here. This is just
Speaker 1: a different map projection. This allows you to turn off
Speaker 1: and on, say timeline or there are some options here,
Speaker 1: but we'll keep them on. And this one allows you
Speaker 1: to label the map in the sense that once you
Speaker 1: turn it on you will see country boundaries, which is useful.
Speaker 1: And if you just click here on the home button,
Speaker 1: you will be taking back to where we started. You
Speaker 1: can again zoom in on any region and you can
Speaker 1: uh look at the year or month that you're interested in.
Speaker 1: What we are going to do now is uh look
Speaker 1: at the analysis options. But let's just look at the
Speaker 1: different data sets available here. Right now we're looking at
Speaker 1: the maps. Map that you'll see here is from GPL
Speaker 1: Water Equivalent Thickness over land. If you click here for
Speaker 1: data search, there are four options, So one way looking
Speaker 1: at here is land GPL water equivalent thickness, and the
Speaker 1: similar thickness is available for ocean. Then there are two
Speaker 1: data data sets CSR water equivalent Thickness. This is from
Speaker 1: University of Texas, Austin. As was mentioned earlier, and then
Speaker 1: this is for ocean, so you can be looking at this.
Speaker 1: You can add this data as well if you like,
Speaker 1: and then it shows both of these two different color
Speaker 1: tables show up, and then you can turn this on
Speaker 1: and off. You can select right. Now, let's just stay
Speaker 1: with GPL water equivalent thickness, and now you can look
Speaker 1: at this symbol here. This allows you to drop a pin,
Speaker 1: draw a box by clicking on the map, and you
Speaker 1: can select a basin. When you click on select a basin,
Speaker 1: you can see that all the river basins are now demarketed.
Speaker 1: And when you point to any of this river basin,
Speaker 1: it highlights with blue color and it shows which basin.
Speaker 1: So this is Mississippi, this is Rio Gran and this
Speaker 1: is Colorado your basin. So let's start with Colorado. This
Speaker 1: is Amazon and you can you can these are global rivers.
Speaker 1: Major rivers are shown here, but let's just focus on
Speaker 1: Colorado River. I'm going to click here to select the
Speaker 1: river basin and now you can zoom in to look
Speaker 1: at map. You can change h values here to edges
Speaker 1: to see proper colors here, and to look at time series.
Speaker 1: Now you can keep operation as time series and choose
Speaker 1: the time domain that you want to look at or
Speaker 1: time range. These are monthly data as we saw, and
Speaker 1: let's keep the entire range right now and say create chart.
Speaker 1: When you click on that, you will see time series
Speaker 1: appearing here. Once you have the time series, you can
Speaker 1: see monthly data. This is the time access and here
Speaker 1: you can see terrestrial water storage change is shown in centimeters.
Speaker 1: The values are fifteen to ten centimeters. And if you
Speaker 1: see on top here, you have several options. You can
Speaker 1: de season this data by clicking here. You can have
Speaker 1: either line or column. You can fit a trend type here,
Speaker 1: you can have either linear or you can fit polynomial.
Speaker 1: You can see that not only there is annual variability,
Speaker 1: but that is inter annual variability as well, and there
Speaker 1: is a steady decrease in terrestrial water storage as you
Speaker 1: can see over this period. And this is the polynomial fit.
Speaker 1: And you can get coefficients here as well. You can
Speaker 1: download this time series either a spn' G your GPEG
Speaker 1: image or PDF, or you can download this data as
Speaker 1: CSV or as XCELS file. You can have this or
Speaker 1: data table. So multiple options are there, but this allows
Speaker 1: you to quickly pick an entire river basin and see
Speaker 1: how TWS is changing over time. Also not to one thing. Here,
Speaker 1: you will see some between there's a gap between grace
Speaker 1: and grace fall on, so you will see missing data here.
Speaker 1: So when you look at maps, it's best to look
Speaker 1: at where you have the data. Also, once you have
Speaker 1: the time series, you can move along this xxis and
Speaker 1: you can see this vertical line. It shows year, month
Speaker 1: and TWS data for that month. This is for the
Speaker 1: entire basin, averaged over the basin and when you are
Speaker 1: clicking through the time, if you look at the map,
Speaker 1: it will show you map for that particular day. So
Speaker 1: this is when we find minimum TWS and you can
Speaker 1: see colors if you see this is mostly in negative TWS.
Speaker 1: If you go to say January, February or twenty two
Speaker 1: thousand and five, you can see now this is in
Speaker 1: blue zone. There is positive TWS animally. So you can
Speaker 1: look at each individual month and corresponding map here. So
Speaker 1: average value and map you can see here. So we
Speaker 1: looked at Colorado basin. We want to now look at
Speaker 1: Ogula lacquifer and for that we're going to turn the
Speaker 1: basins off and draw a box. Now approximate location of
Speaker 1: the Acrefa Gogola Lockwifer is thirty two to forty four
Speaker 1: north and ninety six two one oh six west. What
Speaker 1: I'm going to do is you can click here and
Speaker 1: make a rough box. Then the coordinates will appear. And
Speaker 1: if you know exact coordinates, you can enter here, or
Speaker 1: you can just click and draw a box wherever you
Speaker 1: want to if you're interested in some other region here,
Speaker 1: I'm just going to put exact latitude longitudes inside. Know
Speaker 1: what the region I'm looking for, and once you do that,
Speaker 1: you will see a box appears here the multiple states
Speaker 1: in Ogola lack Pifer. You can see that, and now
Speaker 1: you can do the same. You can create chart and
Speaker 1: this is for that box. Averaged over that box. You
Speaker 1: can see clearly when you can see that there is
Speaker 1: a degrees in terrestrial water storage over time, especially after
Speaker 1: this period. And you can see map also here and
Speaker 1: then when you go down here there is a slow change,
Speaker 1: but you can also see that there are this inter
Speaker 1: annual variability period you can see in the terrestrial water storage.
Speaker 1: So you can explore this in the area of your
Speaker 1: own interest. This is just to show the main features.
Speaker 1: So one more things to see here is that over
Speaker 1: this box. We want to compare different data sets. We
Speaker 1: can go back and add let's look at CSR land
Speaker 1: DWS and you can add the data and now you
Speaker 1: can see that you can turn this on and off.
Speaker 1: So this is JPL and this is CSR, so you
Speaker 1: can compare this. Resolutions are different here. That's why you
Speaker 1: can see this is three degree. I believe this is
Speaker 1: half a degree. So you can click back and forth
Speaker 1: and see this is more smooth. But basic features are
Speaker 1: the same in both the data sets. But so you
Speaker 1: can compare two data sets if you like. And if
Speaker 1: you want to make time series, you will have to
Speaker 1: pick this data set and go through the same procedure
Speaker 1: and compare series. So this is the basic browser that
Speaker 1: we wanted to share with you and you can explore
Speaker 1: other regions. You have an exercise that is based on
Speaker 1: this browser. So I want to conclude this demonstration. Now,
Speaker 1: this concludes our demonstration of the increased Data Analysis tool
Speaker 1: and you will have chance to work with this data tool.
Speaker 1: There is an exercise available on the training page that
Speaker 1: you can download and follow the steps to work on
Speaker 1: a case study. Before we start the exercise, let's summarize
Speaker 1: what we saw today we saw that grazed missions provide
Speaker 1: unique measurements of variations in mass or gravity changes over
Speaker 1: entire Earth surface, producing monthly maps of the gravity field.
Speaker 1: These variations in gravity are primarily related to the movement
Speaker 1: of terrestrial water and they are interpreted in in terms
Speaker 1: of change in equivalent water thickness or terrestrial water storage
Speaker 1: t WS. Using the GRACE TWS along with model based
Speaker 1: hydrologic components, groundwater can be estimated and this is going
Speaker 1: to be the topic of our next session. Finally, GRACE
Speaker 1: data are used to obtain t WS and groundwater change
Speaker 1: information globally and have been useful in monitoring flood and
Speaker 1: rout conditions and large scale groundwater depletion. Now. Prior to
Speaker 1: the launch of GRACE, there were no global measurements of groundwater.
Speaker 1: The only way to estimate groundwater was from well water
Speaker 1: levels wherever they were available. The GRACE missions have made
Speaker 1: it possible to estimate TWS and now we have more
Speaker 1: than twenty years of time series of global water storage
Speaker 1: data and this is a major advantage of GRACE missions.
Speaker 1: There's some limitations we should keep in mind. GRACE and
Speaker 1: GRACE swallow based estimates of t ws and groundwater are
Speaker 1: available globally. However, their special resolution is relatively low. It
Speaker 1: is three hundred eighty by three hundred eighty kilometers square approximately,
Speaker 1: and so it cannot resolve small watersheds. T WS is
Speaker 1: measured in centimeters or meters, which is much smaller compared
Speaker 1: to the Earth's radius which is approximately six and seventy
Speaker 1: eight kilometers, and so TWS has an estimated uncertainty of
Speaker 1: about two to three centimeters. In addition, gravity change is
Speaker 1: caused by mass distribution in the solid earth, such as
Speaker 1: large earthquakes or glacial adjustments. They must be removed from
Speaker 1: the measurements before deriving t WS thickness, so that also
Speaker 1: should be kept in mind. With that, our next ssion
Speaker 1: is going to be about view of groundwater data from
Speaker 1: a Global Land Data Assimilation System version two point two.
Speaker 1: As I mentioned earlier, there is going to be one
Speaker 1: homework assignment that will open on thirtieth of April at
Speaker 1: the end of the training and it will be available
Speaker 1: from the training web page. Answers must be submitted via
Speaker 1: Google forms and the homework will be due by fifteenth
Speaker 1: of May. A certificate of completion will be awarded to
Speaker 1: those who attend all three live webinars and complete the
Speaker 1: homework assignment by the deadline. You will receive a certificate
Speaker 1: via email approximately two months after completion of the course.
Speaker 1: Once again, we want to thank doctor Matthew Rodell for
Speaker 1: his excellent presentation about race missions, data and applications, and
Speaker 1: he will be our speaker next week as well talking
Speaker 1: about jailed as peace groundwater. Contact information for doctor Rottel
Speaker 1: and also you can contact our set anytime with any questions.
Speaker 1: Our set, website and YouTube links are given here. For questions, comments,
Speaker 1: or to share how you have applied our trainings to
Speaker 1: your work or studies, Please email at our set at
Speaker 1: gmail dot com and join our quarterly newsletter to stay
Speaker 1: up to date on our latest trainings and you can
Speaker 1: do that by joining our list serve. Here are some
Speaker 1: useful resources for your information and we want to thank
Speaker 1: you for attending today's session. We have a few minutes
Speaker 1: for our exercise to start the exercise now and then
Speaker 1: we will have our question and answer session. Okay, so
Speaker 1: we'll start with the question and answer session and if
Speaker 1: you have any questions about the exercise, you can email
Speaker 1: us or we can talk next in next session on
Speaker 1: twenty eighth alsome. So we'll start with the questions. Question
Speaker 1: one is that's the distance between both sensors change sometimes?
Speaker 1: And magic can unmuted and answer the question.
Speaker 3: Yeah, hi, I'm sorry, I just uh, I was looking
Speaker 3: at something. Can you say the question more? Oh, does
Speaker 3: the distance be both sensors change sometimes? So yes, it does.
Speaker 3: And actually that's you know, that's the that's the key measurement, right,
Speaker 3: the distance between the two satellites, and normally it's about
Speaker 3: they're about two.
Speaker 2: Hundred kilometers apart, but.
Speaker 3: You know that's sort of the two satellites are free floating,
Speaker 3: so it may vary from you know, by a few kilometers,
Speaker 3: so if you tens of kilometers or the course of
Speaker 3: the mission, I guess, but but yeah, I mean that's
Speaker 3: that's the key measurement, is the the distance between the satellites.
Speaker 3: And really how you know they've measured down to you know,
Speaker 3: how fast is that distance changing? More of a distance
Speaker 3: range rate we call it, and even like the acceleration
Speaker 3: of how it's changing.
Speaker 2: They can look at that as well.
Speaker 1: Thank you. The next question is how can multi source
Speaker 1: satellite data be combined to reduce uncertainty in groundwater estimation
Speaker 1: and what are the limitations of this approach for decision making.
Speaker 2: Well, so the answer is yes and no.
Speaker 3: Here uh, the the grade data are really the only
Speaker 3: satellite observation that provided direct you know's not even a
Speaker 3: direct measurement, but really a measurement that you can use
Speaker 3: to understand changes in groundwater, you know, fairly directly.
Speaker 2: There are others satellites that can give us sort of
Speaker 2: sort of a.
Speaker 3: You know, an idea of what might be happening with groundwater,
Speaker 3: like the recently launched nice Our satellite, which can tell
Speaker 3: us very precise changes in the elevation of the land
Speaker 3: surface when an.
Speaker 2: OKFA is is is dewatered.
Speaker 3: When you remove a lot of water from the ocfur,
Speaker 3: the the the OCFA compacts and so the land surface
Speaker 3: declines a little bit, and we can see that with
Speaker 3: the nice Our satellite. But but it's not really a
Speaker 3: one to one. You know, the Earth isn't perfectly elastic,
Speaker 3: so when you add more water back to the OXFA,
Speaker 3: it doesn't necessarily, you know, the landsurface sort of bouncing
Speaker 3: back to where it was before. And then of course
Speaker 3: there are other observations things like precipitation and solar radiation
Speaker 3: we can be incorporated into our landsurface model as as
Speaker 3: we talked about, and those helped you constrain the overall
Speaker 3: water balance, which then helps us to you know, understand
Speaker 3: how much water may be entering and leaving the Aquifa.
Speaker 1: Thank you. The question three is is the Great Satellite
Speaker 1: Mission suitable for monitoring interest and what stortage changes in
Speaker 1: archipelagic countries such as Indonesia.
Speaker 3: Unfortunately no, And the problem there is that the islands
Speaker 3: are really smaller than the effective spatial resolution of GRACE
Speaker 3: or Grace follow on, and so you have a lot
Speaker 3: of leakage of the signal from the ocean into the island.
Speaker 2: So it's it's very hard to.
Speaker 3: To sort of isolate the mass changes that are happening
Speaker 3: in an archipelagalo or the or an island from from
Speaker 3: the often much larger changes than the ocean that surrounds it.
Speaker 1: And the next question is how can uncertainty in satellite
Speaker 1: dare groundwater estimates be effectively communicated to policy makers? And
Speaker 1: are there probabilistics or machine learning approaches such as measure
Speaker 1: density networks that can better characterize the multi source uncertainty
Speaker 1: inherent in groundwater estimation.
Speaker 3: Well, so I'll take the first part of that is
Speaker 3: effectively communicating to policy makers. What we've really found is
Speaker 3: that you have to put everything into their language. It's
Speaker 3: not enough to say, uh, here's here's a change in
Speaker 3: trust your water storage, or here's a trend in trust
Speaker 3: your water storage. You know, they might just sort of say, yawn,
Speaker 3: I don't know what, I don't know how that I
Speaker 3: can apply that. So so we we found that it's
Speaker 3: important to work with stakeholders and policymakers to develop products
Speaker 3: that are really sort of tailored to their specific needs.
Speaker 3: And and I think, you know, you're sort of answering
Speaker 3: your own question here. Of course, you know, we've only
Speaker 3: just begun to look at how machine learning and AI
Speaker 3: could help with with improving that communication and developing the
Speaker 3: sorts of products that would really be more more valuable
Speaker 3: to these these end users, so that we can ensure
Speaker 3: that they that they really make good use of the
Speaker 3: information that's available.
Speaker 1: Thank you. The next question is does vegetation contribute to
Speaker 1: these animalies or depletion that we see, for example in
Speaker 1: the himalay and north of India and maybe the mountain
Speaker 1: glacier retreat.
Speaker 2: So the glacier retreat.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, there are areas in the world where glaciers have
Speaker 3: been retreating rapidly and that's and there can be a
Speaker 3: very large mass change signal associated with that. And we've actually,
Speaker 3: you know, especially areas where there are multiple glaciers, we've
Speaker 3: we've looked at grace and seen at least the component
Speaker 3: of the grace trend that we can attribute to to
Speaker 3: the the mass loss from the glaciers recording vegetation. I
Speaker 3: did you know a study in that twenty one years ago,
Speaker 3: and and we found that in terms of vegetation water storage,
Speaker 3: the largest changes happened actually over agricultural regions, you know,
Speaker 3: between you know, the time of the times of you know,
Speaker 3: plant growth to to when they're their their maximum and
Speaker 3: most you know, most massive to when they're either harvested
Speaker 3: or they go into sin essence. But those changes are
Speaker 3: still pretty small. They're basically within the uncertainty range of grace.
Speaker 3: I'd say it's on the order of half a millimeter
Speaker 3: per year of equivalent height of water in terms of
Speaker 3: mass change in vegetation water storage. So it's really it's
Speaker 3: not something we typically think about too much, and it's
Speaker 3: you know, if you're interested in that component. It's unfortunately
Speaker 3: not something that's going to be you could easily detect
Speaker 3: within the grace signal because there are so many other
Speaker 3: larger components of the grace signal like the soil moisture,
Speaker 3: changes in groundwater, et cetera.
Speaker 1: Great, Thank you so much. The next question is I
Speaker 1: would like to know what the observation that of grace
Speaker 1: data is in the subsurface. In other words, is it
Speaker 1: useful for evaluating for example, animal is in deep confined
Speaker 1: a prefer systems.
Speaker 3: Well, there's sort of two answers to this question. The
Speaker 3: first is that grace is not limited by depth whatsoever,
Speaker 3: because it's because the grace system is really measuring changes
Speaker 3: in gravity that are associated with changes in mass at
Speaker 3: all depths. There's no there's no limit on how deep
Speaker 3: grace can measure.
Speaker 2: However, if you're talking.
Speaker 3: About confined octfers, there's not so much of a one
Speaker 3: to one between a change in in headed a confined
Speaker 3: oct for and a mass change. So confined oct for
Speaker 3: head is really you know, if you mentioned if you
Speaker 3: put it well into a confined oct for, you're really
Speaker 3: measuring changes in the in the water pressure in that
Speaker 3: confined oc for uh and and that cannot be easily
Speaker 3: translated into a change in in mass storage. So it's
Speaker 3: it's difficult to to say, you know with certainty how
Speaker 3: much of a mass change is is how might be
Speaker 3: happening in the in the confined oct for But we
Speaker 3: do know that there are areas, you know, where unconfined
Speaker 3: and and confined octoras are being over exploited and over
Speaker 3: you know, average, over that very large area that you know,
Speaker 3: at the at the spatial scale that Grace would observe,
Speaker 3: we can see mass changes that almost certainly would be
Speaker 3: partly attributed to changes in those confined oct for us.
Speaker 1: To learn that. The next question is also is interesting.
Speaker 1: Has anyone investigated groundwork the storage changes in area experiencing
Speaker 1: mysterious earthquakes not related to fourth zones, like in the
Speaker 1: Great Plain or Louisiana.
Speaker 3: That's a good question. I don't I don't know that
Speaker 3: anyone has done that, and and I'm not sure exactly
Speaker 3: what the linkage would be there. I guess the idea
Speaker 3: is that if you've removed or added a lot of
Speaker 3: water to the to an opfer, that can then either
Speaker 3: lubricate the faults or or cause other changes that would
Speaker 3: then initiate.
Speaker 2: Such earthquakes. But I don't.
Speaker 3: I don't know of any specific research that's looked into that.
Speaker 1: The next question is, how can we design a unified
Speaker 1: probabilistic data fusion framework that integrates multi scale satellite observations
Speaker 1: and hydrological models to robustly estimate groundwater under uncertainty?
Speaker 3: Wow, that sounds like did AI asked this question? I'm
Speaker 3: not even sure how to answer that. This sounds like
Speaker 3: something that you might write a proposal to do. It's
Speaker 3: not something I can I can just answer off the
Speaker 3: top of my head. But certainly, you know, data fusion,
Speaker 3: machine learning, artificial intelligence, those are all things that we're
Speaker 3: beginning to you know, incorporate into how we analyze satellite observations,
Speaker 3: including GRACE and and combine them with hydrological and other
Speaker 3: other models.
Speaker 1: M The next question is from the Philippines. Given the
Speaker 1: archipelagic nature of our country, how useful would GRACE data be?
Speaker 1: Is that a way to overcome the pixel limitation on
Speaker 1: island nations?
Speaker 2: Well, again, unfortunately not at this time.
Speaker 3: It's it's again an issue with you know, islands being
Speaker 3: surrounded by ocean and they're being very large mass changes
Speaker 3: in the ocean.
Speaker 2: And because you know, Grace is not.
Speaker 3: Looking downward like a like you know, like a camera
Speaker 3: or an imager, it doesn't it can't get you know,
Speaker 3: crisply does define a region. Say this is what's happening
Speaker 3: in the region. This was happening outside. Remember, the key
Speaker 3: measurement is the distance between the satellites, and so we're
Speaker 3: very limited in terms of the spatial resolution we can get.
Speaker 3: And it's you know, you just cannot distinguish, for example,
Speaker 3: Philippine Islands from from the ocean around them in terms
Speaker 3: of in terms of the mass changes. Now if we
Speaker 3: you know, we are researching.
Speaker 2: You know, next generation satellite based.
Speaker 3: Grab imagery and there are some you know, potential systems
Speaker 3: that would increase the special resolution, maybe we get to
Speaker 3: the point where we were able to distinguish an island
Speaker 3: from the ocean around it.
Speaker 2: But that's that's at least a decade away.
Speaker 1: The next question is about I think it's about the browser.
Speaker 1: Why are there not river basins in Scandinavia? And we
Speaker 1: check and let you know, I'm just checking the browser.
Speaker 1: Major river basins, of course are there? Uh, they are
Speaker 1: very small river basins, they may not be included, but
Speaker 1: I will check and it might. Your question the next
Speaker 1: question is to what extent can groundwater depletion infert from
Speaker 1: graze based terrestrial water storage animal is act as a
Speaker 1: predictor or amplifier of compound climate extremes such as heat
Speaker 1: waves and wildfires.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I would say this is this is an active
Speaker 2: area of research.
Speaker 3: And uh, you know, when there's you know it say,
Speaker 3: it's more like the thresher water storage when that is
Speaker 3: is lower than you're you know, treasure water stort is lower,
Speaker 3: that means that the land is drier, there's less water
Speaker 3: available to plant roots, so the vegetation is is not
Speaker 3: as as moist as it could be, and those conditions
Speaker 3: make it more likely that you're going to have a wildfire.
Speaker 3: And similarly, when there's less water available for for evaporation
Speaker 3: and transporation at the surface, you know, when they when
Speaker 3: water evaporates or transpires, the air cools and when there's
Speaker 3: less whata are available, there's less that evaporative cooling and
Speaker 3: so of course that can that can amplify a heat wave.
Speaker 3: And and again I think this is the type of
Speaker 3: thing that the people are very interested in and researching
Speaker 3: right now.
Speaker 1: Great, thank you. The next question is again about the brows.
Speaker 1: The data analysis tool in the chart section for gris
Speaker 1: follow on why not replace no data with nuts and
Speaker 1: we'll give that feedback to the browser developer. Next question
Speaker 1: is what does D season mean? So, and that is
Speaker 1: about browser.
Speaker 2: No no, no, I think, I think, I know this is so?
Speaker 2: This is uh is a great question.
Speaker 3: D season means if you have a time series of
Speaker 3: observations from Grace. So let's say you have a time
Speaker 3: series of trust your water storage anomalies from GRACE over
Speaker 3: a particular region of interest. In that time series, you
Speaker 3: will see a natural seasonal cycle. You know it'll be
Speaker 3: there will be more trust your water storage during the
Speaker 3: wet season and less trust your water storage or in
Speaker 3: the dry season. And you know, depending on what part
Speaker 3: of the world you're in that you know that seasonality
Speaker 3: is different to D season means we use a statistical
Speaker 3: approach to basically remove that seasonal cycle so that we
Speaker 3: can then look at the the sort of non seasonal
Speaker 3: variations in trust your water storage. So, for example, well,
Speaker 3: if it's you know, if the average stress of water
Speaker 3: storage anomaly in the region is is you know, plus
Speaker 3: ten in the in the spring, and the averages is
Speaker 3: uh minus ten in the fall. You remove the seasonal
Speaker 3: cycles so that you have you know, basically zero in
Speaker 3: all seasons, and then it's easier to see like, Okay,
Speaker 3: we're drier than normal this spring, or we're you know,
Speaker 3: wetter than normal this fall. It's easier to sort of
Speaker 3: to understand where we are in terms of thrush of
Speaker 3: water stewards relative to the normal for that time of year.
Speaker 1: Thank you. The next question is how how can you
Speaker 1: get the actual volume of d w S in water
Speaker 1: volume rather than water thickness or equivalent thickness.
Speaker 2: That's that's pretty simple actually, just multiply.
Speaker 3: The the the equivalent water thickness by the area.
Speaker 2: So so if you have a.
Speaker 3: River basin that's one hundred thousand square kilometers and you
Speaker 3: have a trusted water storage anomaly of of of ten millimeters,
Speaker 3: multiply the ten milimeters by one hundred thousand square kilometers.
Speaker 3: You'll have to convert the units to you know, to
Speaker 3: probably be you know, cubic kilometers or cubic meters or whatever.
Speaker 3: And then and then that's how you estimate the volume.
Speaker 1: The next question again is about but the browser are
Speaker 1: the data an is tool. I'm interested in the analysis
Speaker 1: tool and I have a couple of questions. The option
Speaker 1: dtarend data. How is it detrend in the data set?
Speaker 1: So it's just fitting either line or a polynomial as
Speaker 1: you can see two time series and you can see
Speaker 1: the coefficients that it finds at the bottom. And if
Speaker 1: you're talking about removing seasonal trend what explained It just
Speaker 1: statistically removes seasonal variations. And the second part of it
Speaker 1: is that JPL water equivalent and CSR water equivalent. There
Speaker 1: are two data data sets. I see that CSR has
Speaker 1: better special resolution. But can you expand on the differences
Speaker 1: of these data sets? So MET can add to this.
Speaker 1: But I did share a link earlier and I'll put
Speaker 1: it here as well. It describes how to choose a
Speaker 1: data set or how you can average available data sets
Speaker 1: and then use that. But MET, if you have anything
Speaker 1: to add to that, please go ahead.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I just want to I.
Speaker 3: Want people to be careful about, you know, what's viewed
Speaker 3: as better spatial resolution.
Speaker 2: You know, just because CSR provides their.
Speaker 3: Their trust or water storage anomalies on a finer grid,
Speaker 3: maybe I forget if it's the zero point five degrees
Speaker 3: versus one degree, the effective spatial resolution revolution of grace
Speaker 3: remains the same. You still have to average those pixels
Speaker 3: over a sufficiently large region for your results to be meaningful.
Speaker 3: So that especially large region is you know, one hundred
Speaker 3: to one hundred fifty thousands core kilometers at a minimum. So,
Speaker 3: but in terms of other differences, you know, they do
Speaker 3: their processing in different ways, and you know, JPL may
Speaker 3: be better in some ways and CSR in in other ways,
Speaker 3: so it's hard for me to say which one is
Speaker 3: better overall. You know, sometimes people look at the differences
Speaker 3: between the JPL and the CSR and the Goddess Space
Speaker 3: Flight Center and the GFZ products and use that the
Speaker 3: spread among those different products as a measure of uncertainty.
Speaker 3: I don't really like doing that very much because I
Speaker 3: think it only tells you measure of the uncertainty in
Speaker 3: the way they process it, and not so much other
Speaker 3: sources of uncertainty, like the the limitations of the satellite
Speaker 3: observation itself, which would be you know, inheriting all the products.
Speaker 3: And I prefer to just focus on just pick one
Speaker 3: and focus on the science, is always my advice.
Speaker 1: Thank you. So much. The last part of the question is,
Speaker 1: I was wondering if these results would be the same
Speaker 1: similar as downloading the mask ons and plotting the data myself.
Speaker 1: I think, yes, that is true, it's the same data
Speaker 1: that's been shown here. Next question is could a grace
Speaker 1: like mission detect temporal mass changes on Mars and what
Speaker 1: magnitude of water movement would be required for detection.
Speaker 3: So so if you know, if there were significant mass
Speaker 3: changes on Mars, then yes, a grace like mission could
Speaker 3: could detect those. You know, for Earth, we know that
Speaker 3: you know, the the uncertainty level for a monthly gravity
Speaker 3: field or trustre water storage derived field is on the
Speaker 3: order of one to two centimeters equivalent height of water.
Speaker 3: So you need to have changes in water storage on
Speaker 3: Mars that were at least you know, one two centimeters
Speaker 3: equivalent height of water.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: I don't know if anyone knows this for sure, but
Speaker 3: my intuition is that there's you know, pretty much no
Speaker 3: water cycle on Mars, so you're, you know, very small
Speaker 3: changes in mass associated with water storage. You know, there
Speaker 3: may be water know in you know, frozen in the
Speaker 3: polls on Mars, but if it's not moving, then a
Speaker 3: grace like mission isn't really going to tell you much information.
Speaker 2: I can't tell you, just.
Speaker 3: Like on Earth, they can't tell you the absolute amount
Speaker 3: of water there, can only tell you how it changes
Speaker 3: over time.
Speaker 2: And my guess is on Mars not changing much at all.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think you next question is can I find
Speaker 1: the water depths through this in a twenty square kilometer area.
Speaker 3: Not using grace alone. You know, if you use one
Speaker 3: of the the GLEDS two point two data Grace data
Speaker 3: simulation based products, those are available on a on a
Speaker 3: quarter degree grid, so you know, twenty five by twenty
Speaker 3: five kilometers, which is not going to eat you down
Speaker 3: to your twenty square kilometers. And you know, as we discussed,
Speaker 3: there are a bunch of caveats in terms of interpreting
Speaker 3: the Child's two point two data.
Speaker 2: In particular, you.
Speaker 3: Know, the model doesn't know anything about you know, groundwater
Speaker 3: pumping and other human water management, so there are some
Speaker 3: fine scale properties processes not captured by the model, and
Speaker 3: therefore it's not it's quite imperfect in terms of downscaling
Speaker 3: the GRACE data.
Speaker 1: Yeah, just to note that next session on twenty eight
Speaker 1: will be about Jilda's two point two and noctre Rotal
Speaker 1: will explain this again. Question eighteen high everyone, I'm asking
Speaker 1: that Grace twenty five kilometer resolution data is available. I
Speaker 1: think you just answered that we will see that next
Speaker 1: week and with some caveats, but yes, Gildas has quarter
Speaker 1: degree data.
Speaker 3: Right, and again that's not purely Grace data. That's yeah,
Speaker 3: Gray data to you know, assimilate into a landservice model
Speaker 3: and integrated with other observations.
Speaker 1: Next question is can you please help me regarding how
Speaker 1: to create or get started to prepare such interactive web browser,
Speaker 1: So that actually is beyond the scope of this training,
Speaker 1: but we will get you some reference material for that information.
Speaker 1: Next question is is it possible to upload our own
Speaker 1: basin in a shape file format or is there another
Speaker 1: way to download data more systematically and more locally. So
Speaker 1: next a week we will this browser will not allow
Speaker 1: you to upload your own shape file, but you can
Speaker 1: download the data.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 1: The links and information was given in the presentation slides.
Speaker 1: So the data available in net CDF and GOOT format,
Speaker 1: so you can and get them into a GIS QGIS platform.
Speaker 1: You can also specially subset data so your region can
Speaker 1: be extracted and then you can in GIS, you can
Speaker 1: upload your own shape file and do the analysis. So
Speaker 1: if there is interest, we will have a small information
Speaker 1: We will provide information on that. Next question is do
Speaker 1: we need the newest QGS version for the next exercise.
Speaker 1: I believe we're not using any special features, but the
Speaker 1: procedure is based on the newer QGIS version, so when
Speaker 1: you follow the steps you may have to make some adjustments.
Speaker 1: The next question is for identification of a regional signal.
Speaker 1: Can you recommend practices for combining multiple mask ons for
Speaker 1: a single product or for multiple products to estimately W
Speaker 1: S and the uncertainty or of d W S I
Speaker 1: G E G. If you calculate the meantime series, should
Speaker 1: some waiting be applied to de emphasize mascons at the
Speaker 1: edge of the basins or would you say that the
Speaker 1: full range of all mask on across all products represent
Speaker 1: the uncertainty for a region.
Speaker 3: You know, the the mask on products they've already done
Speaker 3: some You know, they put some effort into trying to
Speaker 3: trying to account for for leakage across the basins. So
Speaker 3: so I understand what you're asking, and and you know
Speaker 3: it's possible that you could do a study and show that,
Speaker 3: you know, it's better to to you, you know, wait
Speaker 3: more heavily the interior mask ons than the ones around
Speaker 3: the edge. But I don't, I don't know that's that's
Speaker 3: ever been done. And like I said, you know, the
Speaker 3: mask on products do attempt to to counteract leakage. So
Speaker 3: you know, my general advice is just to use all
Speaker 3: of the equally weight all of the mask ons within
Speaker 3: your region of interest.
Speaker 2: But I'm you know, I'm not certain that that's the
Speaker 2: optimal way.
Speaker 1: The next question is what does water thickness mean?
Speaker 3: Yeah, so we use the term water thickness or equivalent
Speaker 3: height of water two as a sort of a simplified
Speaker 3: way of explaining a mass change. So so if you
Speaker 3: have a mass change it's you know, in terms of uh,
Speaker 3: you know, kilograms of water. We can then say, what
Speaker 3: what would that equate to, you.
Speaker 2: Know, averaged over a region of interest.
Speaker 3: So if we have a you know, grace region that's
Speaker 3: hundred thousand square kilometers, you know, you have a change
Speaker 3: in mass over that region, what would be the equivalent
Speaker 3: height of water that would cause that change in mass?
Speaker 3: And and you can think of it like, you know,
Speaker 3: again grace measures all the different components of trustre water storage.
Speaker 3: So there's the groundwater, the sawmash or the snow, and
Speaker 3: the surface waters. If you took all of that water
Speaker 3: and ponded it on the surface of your region, what
Speaker 3: GRACE is measuring is like changes in the in the
Speaker 3: height or depth of that water. So think of like
Speaker 3: a bathtub, right, So maybe you're you might maybe have
Speaker 3: a bathtub that's you fill a pathway with water and
Speaker 3: then you drain some of the water out and you
Speaker 3: see that you're, you know, one centimeter lower than you
Speaker 3: were before.
Speaker 2: And maybe you don't know.
Speaker 3: The total amount of water in that bathtub, but you
Speaker 3: know you've lost a centimeter of water.
Speaker 2: That's basically what we do with the GRACE data.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Matt. It's a great explanation. And the next
Speaker 1: one is two level three products account for regional earthquakes
Speaker 1: such as the one in twenty twenty three in Turkey, Syria.
Speaker 1: If studying a region like this for groundwater depletion, should
Speaker 1: the impact of seismic events be taken into account.
Speaker 3: So typically what we've seen is an earthquake needs to
Speaker 3: be greater than magnitude eight in order for it to
Speaker 3: have a larger mass change to be you know, to
Speaker 3: really affect the time series in a meaningful way. And
Speaker 3: when there are those large earthquakes, you know, like the
Speaker 3: Sumatra earthquake, then we there are some some specialists who
Speaker 3: work on earthquakes and related you know, gravitational changes that
Speaker 3: have provided data that that the the Grace team has
Speaker 3: used to sort of try to remove that signal.
Speaker 2: It's not perfect.
Speaker 3: It's actually surprisingly difficult to to provide even a mass
Speaker 3: change estimate for an earthquake because because you'll see sort
Speaker 3: of this ringing effect where there's you know, large mass
Speaker 3: change in the middle and then then the opposite sign
Speaker 3: mass change as you uh as you go outward from there,
Speaker 3: and uh, it's it's difficult to to remove that signal.
Speaker 2: But they do make an effort.
Speaker 3: Again for those earthquakes that are larger about magnitude eight,
Speaker 3: that's already incorporated into the products, but it's not perfect.
Speaker 3: So if you see, you know, if if you look
Speaker 3: at a gracetime series around you know, Sumatra area and
Speaker 3: you see some large changes, you know, some of those
Speaker 3: might be real, but a lot of it might be
Speaker 3: you know, part of the earthquake signal that was not
Speaker 3: completely removed.
Speaker 1: Well, that's interesting. The next question is how good is
Speaker 1: the GRASE data if I want to check the correlation
Speaker 1: between levee subsidence and groundwater or is it good when
Speaker 1: analyzing a large area.
Speaker 3: Well, if you're talking about a levee, I mean that's
Speaker 3: you know, then you're on the order of, you know,
Speaker 3: less than a kilometer, right, if I'm understanding the question correctly,
Speaker 3: and you know, again, the GRACE effective spatial resolution is
Speaker 3: about one hundred thousand square kilometers. So so even a
Speaker 3: you know, even a pretty large reservoir, because it's a
Speaker 3: small area, it can be sometimes hard to see the
Speaker 3: changes in water stored in that reservoir behind a behind
Speaker 3: a levee or a dam. For the larger reservoirs in
Speaker 3: the world, as they're filling, you know, for example, the
Speaker 3: three Gorgeous Reservoir in China, we can see that signal
Speaker 3: in the GRACE data.
Speaker 2: But if you're talking about you know.
Speaker 3: A smaller, smaller reservoir or levee, then it's probably going
Speaker 3: to be too small of a signal for GRACE to detect.
Speaker 1: The next question is the tool indicates that the inflammation
Speaker 1: is water thickness, does it mean the thickness of the
Speaker 1: water above and below the ground, is it ignoring the
Speaker 1: layers of soil in between?
Speaker 3: So yeah, I sort of answered this before, But the
Speaker 3: answer is like you take all the water on end
Speaker 3: below the surface and combine it into one. Almost like
Speaker 3: you took all the water and you ponded it on
Speaker 3: the surface, and that's what the thickness of water is.
Speaker 3: You know, changes in that in that ponded water, So
Speaker 3: it's not is ignoring the layers of soil in between?
Speaker 3: I guess the answer is sort of yes, because that's
Speaker 3: the soil layers are not changing, right, You're the mass
Speaker 3: of the soil is not changing unless you're having huge
Speaker 3: amounts of erosion.
Speaker 2: But you know, so it's really just looking at the water.
Speaker 1: Thank you. The next two questions are about the exercise.
Speaker 1: So does this exercise have to be done now? I
Speaker 1: mean in the live session or there is a deadline
Speaker 1: to it. We just gave some time so that you
Speaker 1: can explore the tool and if you have any questions,
Speaker 1: but it's not due today, you have almost between now
Speaker 1: and fifteenth of May when the homework is due. Your
Speaker 1: homework questions will be based on the exercise so you
Speaker 1: have time to finish that later on. The next is
Speaker 1: also about exercise. Yeah, it says month here July. Okay,
Speaker 1: there's a question in the exercise that says to move
Speaker 1: the month here to July twenty twenty one, and then
Speaker 1: it follows with a question regarding July twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: should we used July twenty twenty two? So the question
Speaker 1: is about It goes from you're checking twenty one, twenty two,
Speaker 1: twenty three, twenty four, twenty five, all years, and then
Speaker 1: you are just then looking at one month, so one
Speaker 1: July twenty twenty two. Next question is could you please
Speaker 1: repeat what the vertical line on the plot was. So
Speaker 1: vertical line just it's the it's the place for month
Speaker 1: and year. So when you move that line along X axis,
Speaker 1: it shows which month and the year you're looking at,
Speaker 1: and then you can see the actual TWS animally at
Speaker 1: that that month and year along that line. And also
Speaker 1: as you move the line, you can see the maps
Speaker 1: changing in the browser, so you can see corresponding distribution
Speaker 1: of DWS animalies. Next question is are there any attempts
Speaker 1: to make to downscape the grace data for smaller watersheds
Speaker 1: or high resolution impact studies.
Speaker 3: Yes, there are, and and that's one of the things
Speaker 3: we'll be talking about with GLEDS two point two next week.
Speaker 3: GLS two point two is when we perform data assimilation,
Speaker 3: we take the grace data when we use it to
Speaker 3: constrain a land service model that incorporates a lot of
Speaker 3: a lot of other higher information, higher resolution information like
Speaker 3: precipitation and solar radiation and and soil types and other things.
Speaker 3: So so the answer is yes here, there's also you know,
Speaker 3: people are starting to look at you know, machine learning
Speaker 3: approaches and artificial intelligence and that sort of thing.
Speaker 2: But you know, none of these are perfect answers.
Speaker 3: You're never going to get, you know, a truly high
Speaker 3: resolution grace only product question.
Speaker 1: I think it's a follow up question to the one
Speaker 1: that you answered about the coastal region. It refers to
Speaker 1: the question about the identification of a regional signal given
Speaker 1: multiple mask ons and products and the uncertainty for the signal.
Speaker 1: In answering that question, please also consider the case of
Speaker 1: a coastal region. I think you covered that right, you mean.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm a little I'm a little lost because I
Speaker 2: don't know what the original question was. I'm not I'm
Speaker 2: to answer this one.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm not sure either. The question was about River
Speaker 1: Basini that you know near the edge. Would you just
Speaker 1: consider if you're looking at a region, how would you
Speaker 1: wait different mask ons. We can revisit this later on
Speaker 1: a question that you too. Can you plot multiple data
Speaker 1: on the same chart for comparison? I believe that you
Speaker 1: will have to download CSV files from two different data
Speaker 1: sets and then make time cites, either in Excel or
Speaker 1: in some other software. Question thirty three when will the
Speaker 1: present data March April twenty six be available?
Speaker 3: So the Great team has a goal of making the
Speaker 3: data available within about three months of real time. Often
Speaker 3: it may be more like four or five months, and
Speaker 3: it just depends on the degree of processing that's required.
Speaker 3: And sometimes the satellites are in a better orbit with
Speaker 3: fewer repeat pass overpasses, and other times there's more uncertainty
Speaker 3: to deal with. So I don't know exactly the answer
Speaker 3: to that because I'm not one of the product developers,
Speaker 3: but it's typically typically I would say it's on the
Speaker 3: order three to four months after real time, And this
Speaker 3: is actually one of the things we address with GLS
Speaker 3: two point two and data assimilations we can and much
Speaker 3: closer to real time using other information to extrapolate to
Speaker 3: near real time.
Speaker 1: Great, thank you. So currently I think February twenty six
Speaker 1: is available, but then March April or not there yet.
Speaker 1: Question thirty four. I wonder if we have options for
Speaker 1: downscaling this grazed data so it can fit for analysis
Speaker 1: in the archipelago, and whether there are some approaches to
Speaker 1: mitigate the leakage signal problems on the edge of the island.
Speaker 1: I think tot total is answered this question, but meant,
Speaker 1: if you want to say anything more, yeah.
Speaker 3: Again, I mean, unfortunately, there's just not a whole lot
Speaker 3: we can do to get a good result. You know,
Speaker 3: Grace observation over island where the ocean signals leaking in.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's just it's almost impossible to mitigate that effect.
Speaker 3: So it depends on the side of the island. Of course,
Speaker 3: you know Greenland, you know it is a huge island.
Speaker 3: Then we can monitor changes in Greenland. But if you're
Speaker 3: talking about you know, the Philippines, those islands are going
Speaker 3: to be too small for Grace to resolve.
Speaker 1: Right. Next question is can be interprete water equivalent thickness
Speaker 1: data to identify each in regional wet and dry periods
Speaker 1: influenced my flood events.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean so so if you have a flood,
Speaker 3: I mean, you use there's there's more water there than
Speaker 3: than average, and so you should see you know, a
Speaker 3: significant positive trust your water storage anomaly. But it all,
Speaker 3: you know, it does depend on what we're talking about
Speaker 3: localized flooding. You know, if it's just if it's a
Speaker 3: small area, then that then then it might be too
Speaker 3: small for grace to resolve.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 3: And if it's something like flash flooding where it's really
Speaker 3: just you know, heavy rain and water ponding on the
Speaker 3: surface temporarily, that can be less of a signal, you know,
Speaker 3: less detectable than something like you know, continued heavy rains
Speaker 3: or what happens after a hurricane where you've just had
Speaker 3: you know, many many inches of water.
Speaker 2: Rained down.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so it's it's yes with a with a caveat there.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Next question, Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Speaker 1: But since this is a monthly average data set, it
Speaker 1: may have limited usefulness for water logging analysis influenced by
Speaker 1: surface water and groundwater flooding, especially in a country like
Speaker 1: the UK where rainfall events are frequent and highly variable.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's true.
Speaker 3: I mean it's it's monthly, so so we don't have
Speaker 3: any direct information on what happened within a given month.
Speaker 2: It's only the average over the course of that month.
Speaker 3: And I'm going to talk about GLS two point two again.
Speaker 3: You know, GEOS two x two with the data simulation
Speaker 3: and the corporation of other higher spatial and tempered resolution
Speaker 3: data sets, means that we can look at some monthly variability.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The next question is, I'm not quite sure which
Speaker 1: CEA basin to use for California. I believe this is
Speaker 1: about the exercise. You're actually not looking at any basin.
Speaker 1: You're looking at the state of California. Just look at
Speaker 1: the map to answer the questions. So that's basically you're
Speaker 1: not looking at time seed is you're looking at the map.
Speaker 1: Question thirty eight. Given the course resolution of GRACE data,
Speaker 1: what is the best way to apply it to small basins?
Speaker 1: Is it better to use mask on products or combine
Speaker 1: GRACE with hydroologic model.
Speaker 2: Well, but you know, it depends on the definitive of small.
Speaker 3: So if small or is smaller than about one hundred
Speaker 3: thousand square kilometers, then you know, if you just average
Speaker 3: over the the the grace grids that are available on
Speaker 3: one of the one degree or cattery products. Then then
Speaker 3: you can you can come up with a time series,
Speaker 3: but the errors are gonna be very large because there's
Speaker 3: gonna be a lot of leakage, and I don't recommend
Speaker 3: doing that. It's you know, it's not very meaningful. So
Speaker 3: so the integrated products with the hydrogical models like GLS
Speaker 3: two point two are going to be better for that
Speaker 3: sort of application.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, Matt. We are almost at the
Speaker 1: end of the hour here and it's the end of
Speaker 1: our webinar time. There are questions remaining that we will
Speaker 1: be answering on the Q and a doc and post
Speaker 1: on the website in a week or so. So we
Speaker 1: really want to thank you for returning to this session
Speaker 1: and we hope to see you on twenty eighth of April,
Speaker 1: where doctor Dorot and will again be talking about held
Speaker 1: US two point two with quarter degree resolution to look
Speaker 1: at daily groundwater storage data. And with that we want
Speaker 1: to thank our set team for help, especially our coordinators
Speaker 1: Anatasha Johnson and Jerry Morris, our helper and editor Maria Marabito,
Speaker 1: Jonathan O'Brien, Arrakashell, our coordinator Prop Levins, and our our
Speaker 1: set team Sean McCartney, Rica Podees, our instructional designer Susan Monty.
Speaker 1: Thank you also very much for your help with this webinar,
Speaker 1: and we hope to see you on twenty eighth of
Speaker 1: April at the same time. Thank you. Thanks Matt very
Speaker 1: much for your presentation answering one of the questions
Podbean